The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (“WDTX”) has one of the largest geographic boundaries of district courts in the nation, with divisions located far west in El Paso, the border area of Del Rio, the bustling metropolis of Austin, the Big Bend area of Alpine, Waco, Midland-Odessa, Pecos, and San Antonio. Overall, it encompasses more than 93,000 square miles, roughly the size of Michigan.
Prior to this week, the Court assigned cases geographically, as would make sense for such a large, diverse area. Imagine a plaintiff in Austin filing a case and being assigned hundreds of miles away to the Del Rio or the El Paso Divisions. In a one-page Order issued on Monday, July 25, 2022, Chief Judge Orlando Garcia in the San Antonio Division has ordered that rather than a geographic division, all patent cases filed in the Waco Division of WDTX will be assigned randomly and equitably across all divisions (except Alpine), “until further order of the Court.”
The order includes a list of all judges in the district subject to patent assignments from the Waco Division. The list includes 11 of the 12 sitting district judges (Judge David Guaderrama of the El Paso Division is not on the list and the Alpine Division is currently served by Magistrate Judge David Fannin). The list further includes one senior judge (Judge David Ezra of the San Antonio Division).
This new and disparate treatment of patent cases filed in the Waco Division is most likely a reaction to Judge Albright’s patent docket, as the order states that it was issued “[u]pon consideration of the volume of new patent cases assigned to the Waco Division, and in an effort to equitably distribute those cases.”
It has been almost four years since Judge Alan Albright was sworn in as US District Judge for the Waco Division. In that four years, the number of patent cases filed in the WDTX increased over 1000%. Despite having only heard an average of one patent case per year in 2016 and 2017, patent holders filed 949 cases in the Western District in 2021. In fact, the Western District accounted for 25% of all patent litigation in the U.S. in 2021. As of Monday, the 2022 numbers were on par with the 2021 numbers.
But the filing of patent cases in the WDTX patent docket will likely come to a standstill this week as would-be patent plaintiffs digest the impact of this order.
Chief Judge Garcia’s order comes just months after U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts issued a year-end report acknowledging concerns that patent holders are able to select a division of a district court enabling them to “select a particular judge to hear a case.” Roberts’ report was likely responding to a letter Senators Tillis and Leahy sent to Justice Roberts weeks earlier. The Senators’ letter to Justice Roberts expressed concern over “problems with forum shopping in patent litigation” and noted specific concern regarding Judge Albright’s court. Some believe that this major change in the Western District of Texas is a result of pressure that large nationally-operated companies are putting on lawmakers, who are, in turn, putting pressure on the judiciary to make changes.
The uproar regarding Judge Albright’s patent docket likely stems from companies’ unhappiness with Judge Albright’s perceived pro-patent holder rulings regarding venue transfer, case stays, and timing on patent eligibility decisions. Judge Albright’s patent law expertise and quick time to trial are also often cited as reasons for his busy docket. However, a review of the trial statistics showed that Judge Albright’s court was neither pro-plaintiff nor pro-defendant.
While Judge Albright has well-established patent rules for administration of patent cases and a vast depth of experience, other judges on the list have no patent rules and many have seen only a handful of patent cases in their years on the bench.
- The Order only impacts patent cases filed in the Waco Division of the WDTX after Monday, July 25, 2022.
- All Divisions in WDTX except Alpine will be randomly assigned patent cases filed in the Waco Division.
- There are vast differences in the locations, procedures, and experience levels between the Divisions.
- This will drastically diminish the patent cases filed in the WDTX, almost immediately.
- The Order may change.
- Potential changes that could improve the outlook for patent owners wanting to file cases in WDTX might include the following:
- A more geographically-limited set of Divisions.
- Allowing all Divisions to utilize magistrate judges with patent experience for pre-trial proceedings.
Miranda Jones is an intellectual property litigator specializing in patent litigation. Recognized as the Texas Lawyer’s 'Top Woman in IP' in 2018, she has been helping clients navigate complex patent trial and appeal ...
Sarah represents clients in all aspects of commercial litigation specializing in intellectual property and business disputes. She handles complex cases involving technologies in a wide range of industries including oil and gas ...
- Short Order, Big Change Brought to Patent Docket of Western District of Texas
- NFTs: The Future of Managing Patent Assets?
- There Won’t Always Be a Stark in Delaware
- Significant Current Issues in Patent Litigation: What to Watch in 2022
- How the Shift to a Permanent Remote Workforce Can Impact Venue for Patent Infringement Lawsuits
- What’s Really Going on with Fintiv at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board?
- United States v. Arthrex: Power given to PTAB Patent Judges “Incompatible” with their Appointment
- Anticipating President Biden’s Intellectual Property Policy in an Historical Context
- Patent and Trade Secret Protection of Inventions: 5 Things to Remember on the 5th Anniversary of the Defend Trade Secrets Act
- To Stay or Not to Stay: the Impact of IPRs on Patent Litigation