
On June 1, 2025, the Texas legislature passed HB 40, and Governor Greg Abbott signed it on June 21, 2025. The new law helps further define the jurisdiction of Texas’s Business Courts, originally established in 2023. This is an analysis of key changes in the bill, which will take effect on September 1, 2025. With expanded jurisdiction, we expect more construction litigation matters will find their way into the Business Courts, building a body of case law that could have a substantial impact on the industry.
The most significant impact will be the several ways the legislature expanded the Courts’ jurisdiction:
- Reducing the amount-in-controversy threshold from $10 million to $5 million. This provision also allows aggregation of the amount of all joined parties’ claims to be rolled together to meet the $5 million floor.
- Reducing the threshold value of “qualified transactions” from $10 million to $5 million. Qualified transactions also now include a series of related transactions. This conforms the Courts’ supplemental jurisdiction with the similar federal provision, which allows the Courts to hear any claim “so related to the action” that it forms “part of the same case or controversy.” The parties must agree to the Courts’ exercise of that supplemental jurisdiction.
- Expanding jurisdiction to more intellectual property matters, including trade secret disputes.
- Allowing a party to establish venue in the Courts by using their governing documents.
- Adding investment contracts to the types of actions within the Courts’ purview. Previously, the Courts could hear cases arising out of a contract or commercial transaction.
- If a dispute would fall under the Business Courts’ jurisdiction, allowing suits to enforce arbitration agreements or challenge arbitration awards in the Business Court, as well as appoint an arbitrator if authorized by an arbitration agreement. This creates concurrent jurisdiction with District Courts in this sphere.
These jurisdictional changes bring increased clarity for the Business Courts’ scope and seek to streamline disputes heard by the Court. And, of course, the lowered dollar thresholds will encourage more matters to be brought before the Business Courts.
One section of the bill, however, foreclosed jurisdiction: any cases involving consumer transactions where a consumer in Texas is a party. This applies to claims arising out of a violation of state or federal law.
HB 40 also contained several administrative provisions to clean up aspects of the Courts’ functions. Importantly, the bill moves Montgomery County to the Eleventh Business Court Division (Houston) from the Second Business Court Division, which is not yet operating. The prior sunset provisions for six divisions are vacated, removing the deadline for the legislature to provide funding for them.
To further maximize efficiency in the Business Courts, the legislature authorized the Supreme Court of Texas establish procedures governing (1) jurisdictional determinations based on pleadings or summary proceedings; (2) the establishment of time limits during which issues or claims must be asserted; and (3) interlocutory appeals.
Porter Hedges will monitor the status of HB 40 and provide additional updates as warranted.
- Of Counsel
Tom Gutting focuses his practice on complex construction litigation, regulatory compliance, and corporate investigations, bringing over 15 years of experience in high-stakes dispute resolution and legal strategy. Most ...
Recent Posts
- Texas House Bill 40 Will Reshape the New Texas Business Courts
- Construction Law Update from the 89th Texas Legislature Regular Session
- How do you solve a problem like a tariff? Understanding and addressing tariff risks in construction contracts.
- Should I File My Next Construction Case in the New Texas Business Court? Maybe.
- How Long Does that “One Year Warranty” Last? Longer than You Might Think
- Choice of Law and Federal Preemption: Why Texas Law May Not Govern Your Texas Project Despite the Home Rule Statute
- The Importance of Change Orders on Construction Claims
- Owners’ Rights Pursuing Claims Directly Against Subcontractors/Vendors
- The Initial Decision Maker: Coordinating the Owner-Architect and Owner-Contractor Agreements
- Understanding the Texas Prompt Payment Act
TopicsSelect Category
ArchivesSelect Month
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- September 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- November 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- August 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018