Excluding consequential damages has become a regular part of negotiating engineering and construction contracts. A typical clause excludes recovery of indirect, exemplary, and consequential damages for both parties. Beyond these broad categories, there is often little negotiation as to the specific types of damages that are excluded.1
The lack of more extended negotiations, however, can result in unintended consequences. Most courts agree that lost profits unrelated to the contract at issue are consequential in nature.2 Beyond these types of lost profits there are few categories of damage that courts consistently classify as consequential. Instead, courts have held that common damages arising out of construction projects (i.e. delay damages3 and repair costs4) are direct in some circumstances and indirect in others.
Accordingly, when drafting or negotiating a consequential damages waiver, keep in mind that case law provides very little certainty with respect to the classification of damages as direct or consequential. To avoid unintended risks, consider a definition of consequential losses. Would your definition of consequential losses include some or all of the following losses relating to:
- Revenue or profits
- Anticipated savings
- Goodwill or injury to reputation
- Business opportunity
- Corruption to data
- Use or opportunity
- Financing or bonding capacity
- Loss of product or production
- Business interruptions
- Principal office expenses including compensation of personnel stationed there
Also consider whether it makes sense to carve out certain damages from the definition of consequential damages — for example those provided for elsewhere in the contract — to avoid inconsistent interpretations.
1 In fact, the Texas Supreme Court recently wrote “the line between direct and consequential damages often is not a bright one.” James Constr. Group, LLC v. Westlake Chem. Corp., No. 20-0079, 2022 WL 1594955, at *18 (Tex. May 20, 2022).
2 See e.g. County of Galveston v. Triple B Services, LLP, 498 S.W.3d 176, 185 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2016, pet. denied). “However, lost profits that represent the benefit-of-the-bargain measure of damages required to restore the plaintiff to the economic position he would have enjoyed if the contract had been performed are 'direct' damages when shown to be 'conclusively presumed' to have been foreseen by the parties as a usual and necessary consequence of a breach.” DaimlerChrysler Motors Co., LLC v. Manuel, 362 S.W.3d 160, 181 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2012, no pet.)
3 Zachry Const. Corp. v. Port of Houston Auth. of Harris County, 449 S.W.3d 98, 114 n. 71 (Tex. 2014) (“Delay damages are consequential damages”) but see Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Technip USA Corp., 01-06-00535-CV, 2008 WL 3876141, at *8 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 21, 2008, pet. denied) (holding that certain delay damages were direct).
4 Powell Elec. Sys., Inc. v. Hewlett Packard Co., 356 S.W.3d 113, 119 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, no pet.) (holding that certain repair costs were not consequential) but see Reynolds Metals Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 758 F.2d 1073 (5th Cir. 1985) (holding certain repair costs were consequential under specific facts of the case).
Amy Wolfshohl is certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization in Construction Law and has been recognized by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, The Best Lawyers in America, and Super Lawyers for Construction Law. Chambers sources ...
Search This Blog
- Texas Supreme Court Rules on Governmental Immunity in Construction Contract Dispute
- Bond to Indemnify Against Liens vs. Bond to Pay Liens or Claims
- Recent Construction News under the Inflation Reduction Act
- Tips on Drafting Enforceable and Effective Liquidated Damages Provisions Under Texas Law
- Price Escalation Considerations in Construction Contracts
- Top Five Provisions to Review in Your Construction Contract
- Hurricane Season - Damage Repair Contract Protection for Consumers and Contractors
- What is the Consequence of Excluding Consequential Damages from a Construction Contract?
- Are Forum and Choice of Law Provisions in Texas Construction Contracts Enforceable?
- Where Is “As Is, Where Is” in Texas? The Impact of Contract Disclaimers on Tort Claims in Texas
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- September 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- November 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- August 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018